in: News & Features

October 30, 2015

Mark Kroll To Celebrate Couperin the Great

by

francois-couperinwKeyboardists know the name François Couperin (1668-1733), and so do many audiences and students of music. A cursory look at Couperin turns up some easy pieces in piano primers and some character pieces in music appreciation textbooks. Organists know Couperin as a good composer whose writing doesn’t have much use for the pedal, while historically informed organists don’t have much use for Couperin on North German-style neo-Baroque instruments. Harpsichordists know Couperin for his pedagogical essay L’art de toucher le clavecin and for his 27 marvelous suites or, as he called them, ordres. When it comes to harpsichordists, though, all we seem to hear these days is Bach, Bach, Bach. We can’t blame Bach, however, because he corresponded regularly with Couperin, and Bach’s music is rife with the evidence.

Couperin caught the attention of some of the late Romantics. Richard Strauss’ Tanzsuite aus Klavierstücken von François Couperin is a mash-up of Couperin’s Piéces de clavecin, and Ravel memorialized Couperin le Grand in his Tombeau. Brahms’s relationship with Couperin is even deeper in that he, with Friedrich Chrysander, edited the complete works.

Having left the piano in my late teens to immerse myself in the harpsichord, I was surprised years later to find that some of Brahms’ late piano works look like Couperin. Granted, the similarity stops at the appearance of the engraving, but the resemblance can be uncanny.

Brahms, Intermezzo, Op. 117, No. 1, first edition

Brahms, Intermezzo, Op. 117, No. 1, first edition

 

example-two

Couperin, L’Artiste (19th Ordre), Brahms/Chrysander edition

 

It is said that Brahms based the final movement of his Symphony No. 4 on the closing passcaglia of Bach’s Cantata 150. This is a generally held belief, although some scholars have suggested the chaconne from BWV 1004, the second violin partita. I submit that, since Brahms was the co-editor of Couperin’s Piéces de clavecin during the time he was writing the Symphony, the Passacaille from the 8th Ordre is a good contender for the discussion.

[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/229181488″ params=”color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=false” width=”100%” height=”100″ iframe=”true” /]

 

[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/229181495″ params=”color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=false” width=”100%” height=”100″ iframe=”true” /]

Be that all as it may, it shouldn’t take one, or even two, of the three B’s to hold up Couperin’s superiority in the harpsichord world. As harpsichordist Mark Kroll has said, “François Couperin is the greatest harpsichord composer of the Baroque. Not necessarily the greatest composer of the era, of which there are several candidates—but the composer who wrote the best and most idiomatic music for the instrument. He is to the harpsichord what Chopin is to the piano. It is therefore no surprise that when Debussy was deciding on the dedicatee of his Études pour le piano in 1915, his first choice was Couperin, whom he called ‘the most poetic of our clavecinistes,’ but ultimately decided to dedicate them to Chopin.”

For our 21st-century ethos, Couperin may just not be the right guy to love. He was, after all, writing for the bizarrely refined court of Louis XIV, and it is difficult for educated Americans to love someone who gladly worked for a regime that oppressed the masses. Perhaps Couperin’s writing is much too subtle for our modern tastes intent on hearing flash and fire. As the master wrote in the preface of his first book of harpsichord pieces, “J’aime beaucoup mieux ce qui me touche, que ce qui me surprend.” Now there’s a lesson for our 21st-century ethos: “I like much more what touches me than what surprises me.”

Couperin, La Convalescente (26th Ordre). A less subtle composer would have sounded a note on the fourth beat.

Couperin, La Convalescente (26th Ordre).
A less subtle composer would have sounded a note on the fourth beat.

Harpsichordist Mark Kroll will perform a series of three mid-day recitals at First Church in Boston, 66 Marlborough Street. He writes, “I have been playing the music of F. Couperin for 50 years—really—and I decided to play and record all 27 ordres…while I still can.” The first recital, Nov. 3, features the 3rd Ordre; the second, Nov. 10, gives us the 7th Ordre; the third, Nov. 17, is dedicated to the 13th Ordre. The recitals, on three consecutive Tuesdays, run from 12:15-12:45. Donations are encouraged to support the programming.

Paul Cienniwa is Music Director at First Church in Boston and is the author of By Heart: the Art of Memorizing Music.

4 Comments

  1. After sharing this article pre-publication with Mark Kroll, he wrote, “Brahms owned about 300 Scarlatti sonatas. Check out his song Unüberwindlich, op. 72, no. 5 and compare it with Scarlatti’s Sonata in D major, K. 223.”

    Check this out!:

    https://youtu.be/AxAHfvt1yP4

    https://youtu.be/vCivqKBlZjM

    Comment by Paul Cienniwa — October 30, 2015 at 9:33 am

  2. And this: https://youtu.be/AxAHfvt1yP4

    Comment by Paul Cienniwa — October 30, 2015 at 9:33 am

  3. I attended the first concert yesterday. Playing on an exquisitely responsive harpsichord in the clear, clean acoustic space of First Church Boston, Mr. Kroll gave a memorable, even mind-opening, version of Couperin’s Troisieme Ordre. He played expressively, bringing out the distinctive combination of deep emotionality and deliberate surface “good manners” of the French school. Especially noteworthy was “les Pelerines,” based on the image of a Pilgrimage to Cythera, Island of Love (Cf Antoine Watteau’s famous painting), in which Mr. Kroll emphasized the contrast between the joyous expectancy of love (A section) and the inner acknowledgment that love is illusory and brief (B section). The Chaconne, “La Favorite”, emerged as the philosophical heart of the piece, grave and lucid about human fate. Mr. Kroll then interpreted the concluding piece, “La Lutine” as a return to surface, light and denial — the attitude with which we navigate daily life, as the 18th century “honnete homme” recognized. Personally, I cannot wait until the second concert on November 10.

    Comment by Ashley — November 4, 2015 at 7:20 am

  4. Mr. Kroll’s third and final concert featured the XIIIeme Ordre, from Couperin’s Third Book (1722), starting lyrically with a description of France’s lilies and ending poignantly with “the soul in purgatory” to constitute a complex meditation of human frailty. In the 4th piece, Couperin made the interesting attempt to evoke colors through sound. The attempt is all the more interesting in that the Jesuit Louis Bertrand Castel (1688-1757) designed a “Color clavecin” for the deaf in 1725, made up of color ribbons. For an encore, Mr. Kroll played “les fastes de la grande et ancienne MXnxstrxndxsx”, expanding the audience’s grasp of the mischievous and irreverent side of Couperin. Finally, let me add that Mr. Kroll started the program with a sweetly “galant” rendering of La Marseillaise in a 1792 transcription for harpsichord by Claude Balbastre (1724-1799) — honoring our oldest and most constant ally at a time of dark trial. The whole idea of a Couperin series was most enlightening, as one warms up to his subtle intensity by degrees.

    Comment by Ashley — November 18, 2015 at 8:31 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, this comment forum is now closed.