in: Reviews

May 31, 2010

Memorable Day at Tannery Pond

by

This review is the first in a series of dispatches from an estimable sibling e-journal, The Berkshire Review. From time to time this summer their writers will be covering events in the western parts of Massachusetts and nearby New York for BMInt. In the regular concert season Berkshire Review will selectively re-print some of the articles from this journal. We salute Berkshire Review editor, Michael Miller and anticipate a fruitful collaboration.
Lee Eiseman, publisher

On this desultory weekend, reserved for barbecues, gardening, yard sales, and the occasional superficial gesture to honor our war dead, the green splendor of the Shaker Village at New Lebanon, New York, seemed an unlikely setting for the serious and sometimes stark musical fare offered on Saturday evening, May 29, by the Brentano String Quartet. The Beethoven String Quartet in C-Sharp Minor, Opus 131 alone can exhaust both listeners and performers in its athletic compass of emotional extremes. But the deeply tragic and valedictory Britten String Quartet III, Opus 94, the program’s true centerpiece, was infused with such poignancy and despair that the tranquility of Tannery Pond’s almost ethereal grounds, with their assuring Shaker buildings and yawning fields, offered little succor. The rarely heard Schumann String Quartet in F-Major, Opus 41, No. 2, while having its share of Biedermeir charm, also shared some spectral affinities with the Britten, and evoked, at times, the melancholy of Caspar David Friedrich’s dark and mysterious landscapes. However, two hours later, one could not have been more satisfied and impressed with a performance that transformed the darkness into light with the sheer force of musical intelligence and immaculate technique.

The Brentano String Quartet Mark Steinberg and Serena Canin, violins, Mischa Amory, viola, and Nina Lee, cello has become one of the world’s premier ensembles, placing themselves alongside the Takács, Shanghai, and Emerson as this decade’s artistic successors to the Italiano, Amadeus, Juilliard, and Vegh Quartets. I mention the Italiano and Vegh for special comparison to the Brentano since their style reveals certain affinities to both of these progenitors. The Vegh Quartet was noted for the first violinist’s light touch and discreet presence, which promoted the second violin and viola as more prominent upper voices; the cellist had a wonderfully thick, dark sound, avoided arching legatos and favored short, incisive phrasing. Such is the case with the Brentano. The Italiano quartet was known as having an aristocratic sound, somewhat epicene but extraordinarily elegant in ensemble. Such is also the case with the Brentano. In short, this group has combined qualities that separate themselves from the heavy-breathing approaches of groups that characterized quartet performance from the mid-1980s to mid-1990s. Their intonation is impeccable, their entrances sonically convincing, and their ensemble carefully crafted. Mark Steinberg’s silvery tone, commanding, yet reticent, allowed second violinist Serena Canin to be, at times, the lead. Violist Misha Armory’s tone was extraordinarily well focused; his articulation consistently produced beautiful phrases shorn of the ambiguity sometimes associated with the viola. His instrument, as well, seemed to produce a lighter, more athletic, sound than most. Cellist Nina Lee was magical in her ability to be a perfect complement to the ensemble, while appearing to me (and others, I think) as the energy epicenter of the group itself.

The infrequently programmed Schumann Quartet in F-Major (his first attempt in the genre) puts to rest the weary notion that Schumann was a middling colorist for any instrument other than piano. The sunny opening movement, Allegro Vivace, was played with appropriate warmth and with a luscious sonority. The Andante in A-Flat begins with a lovely melody and is followed by several variations (at variance, as well, to the given theme). These variations, written in 12/8 time, make much use of syncopation and eerie chromatic sequences in the upper strings. Although the Brentano handled these deftly, I wished for more of the unsettling and mysterious, especially in the Molto più Lento variation which anticipates the lonely alienating landscape of Britten’s Passacaglia heard later. However, the Brentano’s intentionally tentative treatment of the ensuing Un poco più Vivace (through the movement’s Coda) allowed Schumann’s playful and macabre ambiguities their full measure to both charm and chill. The C-Minor Scherzo gives us arresting contrasts in a darkly etched Scherzo coupled with a nearly comically caricatured Trio. In this movement, as in the final Rondo, Allegro molto vivace, the demanding string writing replete with jagged syncopations, leaps, spiccato, and double stops was brilliantly carried off.

Britten’s String Quartet III, Op. 94 (1975), written a year before his death, draws thematically from his last opera, Death in Venice, and the cantata, Phædre. It’s a striking and unforgettable work, even if achingly dispirited. While not intended to be a programmatic work, the references in the last movement to the Thomas Mann-inspired opera make it difficult not to find affective correlatives. Idiomatically, the quartet assimilates string techniques and rhythmic modalities from Stravinsky, Bartók, and possibly even Charles Ives. Snapping pizzicatos, piercing string harmonics (even on double stops) and col legno bowing, while commonplace techniques, still challenge performers to make them musically convincing and contextually relevant. The players never allowed the formidable coloristic effect to disrupt the architectural and expressive underpinnings of the score.

In the remarkable opening Duets, the performers work in pairs, combining textural, melodic, or rhythmic cells, as if choreographed, in overlapping pas de deux. Each player had to listen carefully to and augment his or her partner, and the results were fascinating. In the centerpiece, Solo, which actually demonstrates another kind of partnering, Steinberg’s discursive “solo” is accompanied by successive entries of the other three in slow-moving augmented rhythms. The Brentano handled the rough-and-tumble pesante moments of the Ostinato with appropriate force, and the special effects of Burleske with ease and humor. The remarkable final Recitative and Passacaglia, with a beautiful solo by Amory, leads to a near dirge on a ground bass, with Lee playing alternating, throbbing pairs of major seconds. The transformational movement first evokes the course of human desire: pain, abnegation, and then Will’s sublimation which “melts, thaws, and resolves itself into a dew.” The performance was breathtaking throughout.

After the intermission, the Brentano, with energy to spare, dove into one of the greatest of chamber works, the Opus 131 of Beethoven. One assumes that with the lesser-known works of the concert’s first half, most attended tonight to hear just this work. Indeed, I heard musical snippets hummed or whistled by several while on line before the concert. The Brentano’s conception here was consistent with their goal of clarity and restraint that I’ve already alluded to. Canin and Amory lead with the inner voices, while Steinberg and Lee, at the outer poles, provided the frame. The opening Adagio, performed a bit more apace than usual, conveyed the requisite intensity and emotion while never indulging in high drama or gesture. Transparency and lightness were everywhere apparent. The central movement, a set of variations, is a definitive test of an ensemble’s flexibility and emotive range, and the Brentano’s playing here was superb. The great Presto, the most popular movement of the quartet, was taken at a surprisingly slower, gentler tempo than usual. The wonderful Ritmo di Quattro battute section was perfect in contrasting the choppy inner voices against the legato outer ones. However, restraint is not what is essential in the final Allegro. Here, the group mustered preternatural force with machete-like phrasing and rhythmic incisiveness.

The Tannery is a beautiful hall and acoustically resonant. On the lower level, one sits comfortably on original Shaker benches outfitted with cushions. The stage is barely raised, and with the lack of raking, visibility is a problem for most on the main floor. If you want to see the performers, you must sit upstairs – the price to pay being the less comfortable metal seats and the mushroom of summer heat clinging to the rafters. I didn’t mind not being able to see around a balloon-headed attendee: after all, it was the music, and one could hear everything anywhere at Tannery. The crowd, a fusion, it seemed, of upscale Berkshire sophisticates and academics, seemed a far cry from the more casual Tanglewood Lawn diners. However, in the middle of the Beethoven finale, my large-headed obstruction stood up with his wife and friends in tow, and disruptively, en masse, left the hall. I can only imagine that the long concert interfered with dinner reservations, and, believing themselves invisible and entitled, they could offend the audience around them with a French exit. While the Brentano didn’t miss a beat, one wondered how insulting such an antic was to the musicians caught in the passion of Beethoven’s great work.

Seth Lachterman lives in Hillsdale, New York. While dividing his past academic career between music (composition and musicology) and mathematics, he has been a principal at Encore Systems, LLC. He writes regularly for Berkshire Review of The Arts and writes for BMInt in a collaborative venture.

3 Comments

  1. A wonderfully articulate (and IMHO totally accurate) account of Saturday’s extraordinary concert. (I, too, was annoyed by the bizarrely-timed exit of the four audience members and am thankful that the reviewer saw fit to mention it in his piece. The only excuse I can see for that sort of behavior is illness.)

    Comment by Judy Grunberg — June 1, 2010 at 1:26 am

  2. My compliments to Mr. Lachterman for an interesting and helpful review, all the more impressive by its quick publication. Many thanks!

    Comment by Mark Alimansky — June 1, 2010 at 9:27 am

  3. I’ve attended two concerts at Tannery Pond; one several years ago of the beautiful Piano Trio by Tchaikovsky (underrated I think) and last year, Beethoven’s String Quartet op 59 #3. (As a joke, I told my fiends I was going to New Lebanon to hear Beethoven’s Ninth. I didn’t claim it was a FUNNY joke.) Unless I’m mistaken, the Tannery Pond facility is not set up for the elderly or handicapped. The rest rooms are not IN the concert hall, but in a separate building. It’s possible that one or nore of the people mentioned above thought they could “hold it in”, not realizing that the opus 131 is almost as long as the “Eroica”

    Comment by Laurence Glavin — June 5, 2010 at 2:54 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, this comment forum is now closed.